Cox v. Cox

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Cox v. Cox

27 S.C. Eq. 275

DecidedJanuary 15, 1854

StatusPublished

This text of 27 S.C. Eq. 275 (Cox v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Cox, 27 S.C. Eq. 275 (S.C. Ct. App. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that, without considering or approving any other ground, the plaintiff’s right to a decree was barred by the statute of limitations, which began to run against the alleged fraud from the defendant’s purchase ; (see Thrower vs. Cureton, 4 Strob. Eq. 155, and McDonald vs. May, 1 Rich. Eq., 91), and that the bill was rightly dismissed.

JohnstoN, Dunkin, Dargan and Wardi,aw, CC., concurring.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that, without considering or approving any other ground, the plaintiff’s right to a decree was barred by the statute of limitations, which began to run against the alleged fraud from the defendant’s purchase ; (see Thrower vs. Cureton, 4 Strob. Eq. 155, and McDonald vs. May, 1 Rich. Eq., 91), and that the bill was rightly dismissed.

JohnstoN, Dunkin, Dargan and Wardi,aw, CC., concurring.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 S.C. Eq. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-cox-scctapp-1854.