Cox v. City of Oklahoma City
This text of 1983 OK CR 150 (Cox v. City of Oklahoma City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellant, Delmer Cox, a dealer in precious metals and gems, purchased three (3) gold rings and filled out one form with the information, as required by the regulating ordinance of Oklahoma City. He failed to fill out a separate form for each item purchased, as provided by additional Oklahoma City Police Department instructions. He was charged, tried and convicted for violation of ordinance No. 16,149.1
On appeal he urges the requirement of the O.C.P.D., that a separate form be filled out for each item purchased, enlarged the provisions of the city ordinance and that a person of ordinary understanding could not know and understand that a failure to comply with the additional requirement constituted a violation of Section 5(b) of the ordinance. Although it is true that under the ordinance the city may require a purchaser to complete forms provided by the Police Department for each transaction, the requirement that a separate form must be filled out for each item purchased cannot be ascertained from the ordinance. Further, Officer Storey testified that the only place the requirement could be found was in supplementary instructions available at the Police Department.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to DISMISS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1983 OK CR 150, 671 P.2d 67, 1983 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-city-of-oklahoma-city-oklacrimapp-1983.