Cox v. City of New York
This text of 196 A.D.2d 855 (Cox v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered June 3, 1991, which denied their motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1993.