Cox v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cox v. City of New York

196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 759

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1993·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered June 3, 1991, which denied their motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered June 3, 1991, which denied their motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cox v. City of New York, 196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

196 A.D.2d 855 (Cox v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related