Cox v. City of Jackson, Tennessee

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

STEVEN F. COX, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01026-JDB-jay ) CITY OF JACKSON, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL COMPLAINT

Pending on the Court’s docket is the April 5, 2019, motion of the Defendant, City of Jackson, Tennessee, to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 22.) On May 31, 2019, the Plaintiffs amended their complaint. (D.E. 33.) As “[a]n amended complaint supersedes an earlier complaint for all purposes,” In re Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litig., 731 F.3d 586, 589 (6th Cir. 2013), the motion to dismiss the initial complaint is now moot and is DENIED on that basis. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of June 2019. s/ J. DANIEL BREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE