Cox v. Charles Cone Realty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cox v. Charles Cone Realty Co.

100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 228, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 513

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 9, 1919

Docket10439

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 642 (Cox v. Charles Cone Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. Charles Cone Realty Co., 100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 228, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 513 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in this case in rendering the following judgment: “It is considered, ordered and adjudged, that the within certiorari be and the same is hereby overruled and the judgment allowed to proceed in favor of Chas. Cone Realty Co. v. W. S. Cox, for the principal sum of one hundred ninety and no/100 dollars, interest and costs.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in this case in rendering the following judgment: “It is considered, ordered and adjudged, that the within certiorari be and the same is hereby overruled and the judgment allowed to proceed in favor of Chas. Cone Realty Co. v. W. S. Cox, for the principal sum of one hundred ninety and no/100 dollars, interest and costs.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 642, 24 Ga. App. 228, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-charles-cone-realty-co-gactapp-1919.