Cox v. Callender
9 Mass. 533
Opinion
To maintain trespass, one must have a right of entry, and perhaps an actual entry is necessary. . When a disseisee enters, having a right of entry, he changes the disseisin into a trespass. But on the facts in the present case, it is very clear the plain tiffs cannot maintain their action,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Callender, 9 Mass. 533 (Mass. 1813).
9 Mass. 533 (Cox v. Callender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mead v. West Pub. Co.
80 F. 380 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1896)
Huling v. Florida Savings Bank & Real Estate Exchange
19 Fla. 695 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1883)
Fuhrer v. Langford
11 Mo. App. 286 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Thomes v. Moody
11 Me. 139 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1834)
Codman v. Jenkins
14 Mass. 93 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1817)