Cox v. Callender
This text of 9 Mass. 533 (Cox v. Callender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To maintain trespass, one must have a right of entry, and perhaps an actual entry is necessary. . When a disseisee enters, having a right of entry, he changes the disseisin into a trespass. But on the facts in the present case, it is very clear the plain tiffs cannot maintain their action,
Plaintiffs nonsuit.
,) [Vide Fletcher vs. Macfarlane, 12 Mass. Rep. 46.— Taylor vs. Townsend, 8 Mass Rep. 415. — Sed vide Emerson vs. Thompson, 2 Pick. 473. —Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Mass. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-callender-mass-1813.