Cox v. Burdick
912 A.2d 482, 280 Conn. 951
This text of 912 A.2d 482 (Cox v. Burdick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cox v. Burdick, 912 A.2d 482, 280 Conn. 951 (Colo. 2006).
Opinion
Patrick COX
v.
Patricia BURDICK.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Conrad Ost Seifert, Old Lyme, in support of the petition.
*483 Randall A. Ortega, Norwich and Matthew G. Berger, New London, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn.App. 167, 907 A.2d 1282 (2006), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cox v. Burdick
907 A.2d 1282 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
912 A.2d 482, 280 Conn. 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-burdick-conn-2006.