Cox v. Boxer
This text of 89 F. App'x 63 (Cox v. Boxer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PFR AND PFREB
The Memorandum Disposition filed on August 8, 2002, is withdrawn. An opinion will be filed.
A majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Tashima and Rawlinson voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Hall recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc filed on September 16, 2002 is denied.
No additional petitions for rehearing may be filed in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F. App'x 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-boxer-ca9-2004.