Cox v. Barton

99 S.E. 47, 23 Ga. App. 573, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 220
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1919
Docket10280
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 47 (Cox v. Barton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Barton, 99 S.E. 47, 23 Ga. App. 573, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Assignments of error not urged in the brief of the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned. The evidence in this case, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The finding of the jury having the approval of the able trial judge, and there being no error of law in the trial, insisted upon here,- the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is-

Affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shives v. Young
57 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 47, 23 Ga. App. 573, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-barton-gactapp-1919.