Cox v. Barton

99 S.E. 47, 23 Ga. App. 573, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 220
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1919·No. 10280·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

Assignments of error not urged in the brief of the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned. The evidence in this case, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The finding of the jury having the approval of the able trial judge, and there being no error of law in the trial, insisted upon here,- the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is-

Affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Barton, 99 S.E. 47, 23 Ga. App. 573, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

99 S.E. 47 (Cox v. Barton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shives v. Young
57 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)