Cox v. Astrue

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 24, 2010
• Docket: 10-1677
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1677

TIJON COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Social Security Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00581-CCB)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

TiJon Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

TiJon Cox appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint alleging violations of his rights under

the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Cox v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-00581-CCB (D. Md.

June 7, 2010). We further deny Cox’s motions for default

judgment and for summary disposition. We deny Cox’s motions to

expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED