Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp.

Fifth Circuit

Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp.

551 F.2d 93, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 483, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13745, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7850

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 20, 1977·No. No. 75-2109·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TUTTLE, AINSWORTH and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, RO-[94]*94NEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TUTTLE, AINSWORTH and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, RO-[94]*94NEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp., 551 F.2d 93, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 483, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13745, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7850 (5th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

551 F.2d 93 (Cox v. Allied Chemical Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related