Cox v. Adams & Co.

63 S.E. 60, 5 Ga. App. 296, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 101
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 8, 1908
Docket1409
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 63 S.E. 60 (Cox v. Adams & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Adams & Co., 63 S.E. 60, 5 Ga. App. 296, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 101 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Powell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The headnotes cover the points of law involved. It appears from the order of the judge of the superior court that he has not reviewed the facts, as he has the legal right and duty to do. He was in error in remanding the case on the ground assigned in the order. His judgment is therefore reversed, with direction that he pass upon the facts; and if he approves the verdict of the jury as a finding of fact, that the certiorari be dismissed, otherwise that he sustain the certiorari and grant a new trial before another jury in the justice’s court. Judgment reversed, with direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. Taylor
200 S.E. 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Butler v. Winton
192 S.E. 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Potter v. Davidson
21 P.2d 785 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Howard v. Franklin
124 S.E. 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
McKibben v. Luther Williams Banking Co.
123 S.E. 726 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Union Marine Fire Insurance v. McDermott
121 S.E. 849 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Lucas v. Oglesby
111 S.E. 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Drake v. Lewis
79 S.E. 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Cox v. Fletcher & Adams
63 S.E. 61 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 60, 5 Ga. App. 296, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-adams-co-gactapp-1908.