Cox, Simon v. Sergenian, J.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin·Decided July 8, 2025·No. 3:23-cv-00727·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SIMON JAMES COX,

Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v.

23-cv-727-jdp OFFICER J. SERGENIAN,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Simon James Cox, proceeding without counsel, alleges that he was falsely arrested and subjected to unlawful conditions of confinement. Dkt. 1. I dismissed Cox’s complaint because all of his allegations were factually frivolous or failed to state a claim for which I could grant relief. Dkt. 4. I gave Cox until May 25, 2025, to amend the complaint to fix those problems, and I cautioned him that I would dismiss the case if he failed to comply with that order. Cox has not responded to that order, so I will dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See Paul v. Marberry, 658 F.3d 702, 704–05 (7th Cir. 2011) (court should dismiss case for failure to state a claim after plaintiff fails to correct a pleading that violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Simon James Cox’s complaint, Dkt. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice because the allegations are factually frivolous or fail to state a claim. 2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Entered July 7, 2025. BY THE COURT:

/s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox, Simon v. Sergenian, J., (W.D. Wis. 2025).

Cox, Simon v. Sergenian, J. (Cox, Simon v. Sergenian, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry
658 F.3d 702 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)