Cox, Ronald Lynn v. State
Opinion
Order entered October 1, CO , 2012
In The Court of Zippeal5 jriftb Mititritt of Texao at Mattao No. 05-12-00881-CR
RONALD LYNN COX, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB10-25500-E
ORDER The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
DAV L. bRIDGES JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox, Ronald Lynn v. State (Cox, Ronald Lynn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.