Cox, Gilmore Franklin

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 6, 2013
DocketWR-42,794-05
StatusPublished

This text of Cox, Gilmore Franklin (Cox, Gilmore Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox, Gilmore Franklin, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-42,794-05
EX PARTE GILMORE FRANKLIN COX, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-29938-A IN THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ANGELINA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and possession of certain chemicals with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance. He was sentenced to imprisonment for twenty and thirty-five years, respectively. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Cox v. State, No. 12-11-00297-CR (Tex. App.--Tyler 2012, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to investigate whether the substances alleged in count two of the indictment, possession of certain chemicals with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance, were designated by the Director of the Department of Public Safety as immediate precursors.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim. (1) The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the substances alleged in count two of the indictment were designated by the Director of the Department of Public Safety as immediate precursors. Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.002(22); 37 Tex. Admin. Code § 13.117. The trial court shall also determine whether counsel's conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: November 6, 2013

Do not publish

1. In a sworn affidavit, counsel responded to Applicant's claims, but we do not believe his response is sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Patterson
993 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cox, Gilmore Franklin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-gilmore-franklin-texcrimapp-2013.