Cox-El v. Flanagan

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 24, 2001
• Docket: 01-6302
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6302

ELWOOD COX-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LAMONT W. FLANAGAN, Commissioner of Division of Pretrial Detention & Services; WILLIAM JEDNORSKI, Warden, Baltimore Central Booking Intake Center; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Baltimore Mayor; BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL; CITY OF BALTIMORE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

3 UNKNOWN NAMED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, at Central Booking Intake Center,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-2588-S)

Submitted: July 31, 2001 Decided: August 24, 2001

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elwood Cox-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; William Rowe Phelan, Jr., OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Elwood Cox-El appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Cox-El v. Flanagan, No. CA-00-2588-S (D.

Md. Feb. 5, 2001). We deny Cox-El’s motion for the appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED