Cowsert v. State

276 S.W.3d 395, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2009 WL 242339
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 2009
DocketED 91154
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 395 (Cowsert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowsert v. State, 276 S.W.3d 395, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2009 WL 242339 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Scott Cowsert (“Cowsert”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Gary M. Gaerntner, Jr. presiding, after a jury convicted Cowsert of two counts of involuntary manslaughter. The court sentenced Cowsert to consecutive sentences of five years in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

In his sole point on appeal, Cowsert claims the trial court erred in denying Cowsert’s Rule 29.15 motion because Cow-sert’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) file for a change of venue; (2) question jurors regarding Ray Barnes and his place of employment; and (3) request any curative action by the trial court regarding Barnes’ behavior in front of the jury.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jagger v. Stark
276 S.W.3d 395 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.W.3d 395, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2009 WL 242339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowsert-v-state-moctapp-2009.