Cowsert v. State

276 S.W.3d 395, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2009 WL 242339
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. ED 91154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Scott Cowsert (“Cowsert”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Gary M. Gaerntner, Jr. presiding, after a jury convicted Cowsert of two counts of involuntary manslaughter. The court sentenced Cowsert to consecutive sentences of five years in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

In his sole point on appeal, Cowsert claims the trial court erred in denying Cowsert’s Rule 29.15 motion because Cow-sert’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) file for a change of venue; (2) question jurors regarding Ray Barnes and his place of employment; and (3) request any curative action by the trial court regarding Barnes’ behavior in front of the jury.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowsert v. State, 276 S.W.3d 395, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2009 WL 242339 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

276 S.W.3d 395 (Cowsert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jagger v. Stark
276 S.W.3d 395 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)