Cowper v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cowper v. Johnson

340 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2011 WL 1531738

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2011

DocketED 95143

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 604 (Cowper v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowper v. Johnson, 340 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2011 WL 1531738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Donnie Johnson, appeals from the judgment awarding plaintiff, Nichole Cowper, $2669.49 on her cause of action arising from a car repair. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(l)(5). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Donnie Johnson, appeals from the judgment awarding plaintiff, Nichole Cowper, $2669.49 on her cause of action arising from a car repair. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(l)(5). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 604, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 502, 2011 WL 1531738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowper-v-johnson-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack