Cowlin v. . Cook

1 N.C. 741
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 741 (Cowlin v. . Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowlin v. . Cook, 1 N.C. 741 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

CREW, C. J., DODERIDGE, JONES, and WHITLOCK, JJ. By the words nonimplacitaret he has waived the benefit of the obligation; but yet this promise does not take away the force of the obligation, for he may sue the obligor presently, and the other may have his action on the promise quodnon implacitaret, which shall not be intended for an hour, or a day, but for his whole life. In Bracham's case, it was resolved that a consideration that he would forbear shall be intended for his whole life. But if it bepapululum tempus, it is a bad consideration. Poph., 183; Noy, 83; Hobb, 219; 2 Cr., 683.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowlin-v-cook-kingsbench-1793.