Cowles v. Kulplinski
This text of Cowles v. Kulplinski (Cowles v. Kulplinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6251
CLINTON DECARLO COWLES, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN KULPLINSKI, Administrator; CARL SMITH, JR., Officer; D. L. ARNOLD, Captain/Director of Personnel and Training,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00836-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Cowles v. Kulplinski, No.
1:10-cv-00836-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cowles v. Kulplinski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowles-v-kulplinski-ca4-2011.