Cowles v. Kulplinski

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2011
Docket11-6251
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cowles v. Kulplinski (Cowles v. Kulplinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowles v. Kulplinski, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6251

CLINTON DECARLO COWLES, SR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JOHN KULPLINSKI, Administrator; CARL SMITH, JR., Officer; D. L. ARNOLD, Captain/Director of Personnel and Training,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00836-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., appeals the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Cowles v. Kulplinski, No.

1:10-cv-00836-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cowles v. Kulplinski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowles-v-kulplinski-ca4-2011.