Cowles v. Hart

1 Root 396
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court were of opinion — Tbat tbe law is so upon tbe facts aforesaid tbat tbe defendants did not assume and promise; and gave judgment for tbe defendants to recover tbeir cost.

Tbe statute makes void all obligations, securities, mortgages, etc. given for more than lawful interest as a penalty [397] upon the lender, and for the protection of indigent borrowers. If the plaintiff might recover the principal of his debt in this action, after his security is avoided, the design of the statute would be in a measure defeated — the manifest intention of which is not only to make void the security; but the debt also.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowles v. Hart, 1 Root 396 (Colo. 1792).

1 Root 396 (Cowles v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philadelphia Loan Co. v. Towner
13 Conn. 249 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1839)