Cowles v. Cowles

112 Mass. 298
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

This libel for divorce alleges cruel and abusive treatment only. In support of it the wife’s utter denial of sexual intercourse is relied on. It is not now contended that any other cause of divorce exists.

Such conduct is not to be regarded, within a reasonable inserpretation of the provision of St. 1870, c. 404, § 2, as cruel and abusive treatment. Under the like provision of Gen. Sts. c. 107, § 9, it has been held that the cruelty charged must appear to be such “ as shall cause injury to life, limb, or health, or create a danger of such injury, or a reasonable apprehension of such danger.” Bailey v. Bailey, 97 Mass. 373. Peabody v. Peabody, 104 Mass. 195. Southwick v. Southwick, 97 Mass. 327.

It plainly does not go to the original validity of the marriage, and affords no ground for declaring the nullity of it.

Exceptions overruled,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowles v. Cowles, 112 Mass. 298 (Mass. 1873).

112 Mass. 298 (Cowles v. Cowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

X. v. X.
47 A.2d 470 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1946)
A v. A
42 Del. 605 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)
Osbon v. Osbon
240 N.W. 894 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1932)
Schoren v. Schoren
214 P. 885 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
Foster v. Foster
138 N.E. 360 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)
Curtiss v. Curtiss
136 N.E. 829 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Risk v. Risk
202 A.D. 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Roush v. Roush
111 S.E. 334 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1922)
Sasserno v. Sasserno
134 N.E. 239 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Millar v. Millar
167 P. 394 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Nordlund v. Nordlund
166 P. 795 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Anders v. Anders
113 N.E. 203 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
de Coito v. de Coito
21 Haw. 339 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1912)
Lohmuller v. Lohmuller
135 S.W. 751 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Anonymous
52 N.J. Eq. 349 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1894)
Segelbaum v. Segelbaum
39 N.W. 492 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1888)
Stewart v. Stewart
7 A. 473 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1887)