Cowles v. Coster
4 Hill & Den. 550
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedFebruary 15, 1843
StatusPublished
This text of 4 Hill & Den. 550 (Cowles v. Coster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cowles v. Coster, 4 Hill & Den. 550 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).
Opinion
By the Court,
The 23d. rule is that, after plea, either party may, before default for nut answering shall be entered, amend the pleading to be answered. The rule does not extend to a pleading already answered. But there was no need of this motion. The course for the defendant was to treat the amended replication as a nullity.
Motion denied,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Hill & Den. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowles-v-coster-nycterr-1843.