Cowgill v. Francis
This text of 1944 OK 225 (Cowgill v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them in the trial court and on August 30, 1943, filed their brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.
The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order of the trial court granting the permit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1944 OK 225, 149 P.2d 253, 194 Okla. 236, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowgill-v-francis-okla-1944.