Cowgill v. Bank of America
This text of 831 So. 2d 241 (Cowgill v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eric COWGILL and Dana Cowgill Yeager, Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, as Personal Representative, and Mickey Cowgill, individually, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Bonita Kneeland Brown of Fowler, White, Boggs, Banker, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.
Phillip A. Baumann and J. Richard Caskey of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Mickey Cowgill.
*242 No Appearance for Appellee Bank of America.
WHATLEY, Judge.
We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of Mickey Cowgill on the ground that the action filed by Eric Cowgill and Dana Cowgill Yeager, the Appellants, was barred by the statute of limitations.
We reverse the award of attorney's fees to Mickey Cowgill pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2000), because the Appellants' claim was arguably supported by material facts and then-existing law.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
STRINGER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
831 So. 2d 241, 2002 WL 31525584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowgill-v-bank-of-america-fladistctapp-2002.