Cowette v. Furnace

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Cowette v. Furnace

202 N.W.2d 882, 295 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1145

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 22, 1972

DocketNo. 43472

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.W.2d 882 (Cowette v. Furnace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowette v. Furnace, 202 N.W.2d 882, 295 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1145 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari on the relation of Franklin Furnace and its insurer to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding to the employee compensation and medical benefits.

Relators challenge the commission’s finding that the respondent was the employee of relator Franklin Furnace and that the latter had actual notice of the injury.

No purpose would be served in restating the facts on this appeal. It is sufficient to say that, upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of the court that the findings of the commission as to the status of employee and notice to employer of the injury are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record. The commission accepted the employee’s testimony as to what happened as be[530]*530ing correct. The record supports the credibility of the employee’s testimony.

Respondent is hereby allowed attorney’s fees of $400.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certiorari on the relation of Franklin Furnace and its insurer to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding to the employee compensation and medical benefits.

Relators challenge the commission’s finding that the respondent was the employee of relator Franklin Furnace and that the latter had actual notice of the injury.

No purpose would be served in restating the facts on this appeal. It is sufficient to say that, upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of the court that the findings of the commission as to the status of employee and notice to employer of the injury are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record. The commission accepted the employee’s testimony as to what happened as be[530]*530ing correct. The record supports the credibility of the employee’s testimony.

Respondent is hereby allowed attorney’s fees of $400.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.W.2d 882, 295 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowette-v-furnace-minn-1972.