Cowenhoven v. Onderdonk
1 How. Pr. 58
This text of 1 How. Pr. 58 (Cowenhoven v. Onderdonk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cowenhoven v. Onderdonk, 1 How. Pr. 58 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).
Opinion
[59]*59The court denied the motion, on the ground, among others, that although Onderdonk had informed Cowenhoven after he had bought the judgment that he had purchased it for him, still he could not compel him to assign; and also because Ullman the judgment creditor was the party, if any, to complain.
Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowenhoven-v-onderdonk-nysupct-1844.