Cowen v. . Williams

149 S.E. 396, 197 N.C. 432, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 259
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1929·Published

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It would seem that the plea of nudum pactum is not open to the defendant, Lucy Williams, as against the plaintiff, who is a holder in due course of the note sued on. Hence the instruction, above set out, which forms the basis of one of the plaintiff’s exceptions, we apprehend, should be held for error. Angier v. Howard, 94 N. C., 27.

A note under seal imports consideration, and it is presumed from the use of a seal, that the consideration is good and sufficient. Harrell v. Watson, 63 N. C., 454; Wester v. Bailey, 118 N. C., 193, 24 S. E., 9; Moose v. Crowell, 147 N. C., 551, 61 S. E., 524; Burriss v. Starr, 165 N. C., 657, 81 S. E., 929. See, also, Barbee v. Barbee, 108 N. C., 581, 13 S. E., 215.

For the error, as indicated, a new trial must be awarded; and it is so ordered.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowen v. . Williams, 149 S.E. 396, 197 N.C. 432, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 259 (N.C. 1929).

149 S.E. 396 (Cowen v. . Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moose v. . Crowell
61 S.E. 524 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Barbee v. . Barbee
13 S.E. 215 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Wester v. . Bailey
24 S.E. 9 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Harrell, Administrator C. v. . Watson and Others
63 N.C. 454 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1869)
Burriss v. . Starr
81 S.E. 929 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Angier v. Howard
94 N.C. 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)