Cowen v. . Williams
This text of 149 S.E. 396 (Cowen v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating the case: It would seem that the plea of nudum pactum is not open to the defendant, Lucy Williams, as against the plaintiff, who is a holder in due course of the note sued on. Hence the instruction, above set out, which forms the basis of one of the plaintiff’s exceptions, we apprehend, should be held for error. Angier v. Howard, 94 N. C., 27.
A note under seal imports consideration, and it is presumed from the use of a seal, that the consideration is good and sufficient. Harrell v. Watson, 63 N. C., 454; Wester v. Bailey, 118 N. C., 193, 24 S. E., 9; Moose v. Crowell, 147 N. C., 551, 61 S. E., 524; Burriss v. Starr, 165 N. C., 657, 81 S. E., 929. See, also, Barbee v. Barbee, 108 N. C., 581, 13 S. E., 215.
For the error, as indicated, a new trial must be awarded; and it is so ordered.
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 S.E. 396, 197 N.C. 432, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowen-v-williams-nc-1929.