Cowen & Co. v. Anderson

155 A.D.2d 243

This text of 155 A.D.2d 243 (Cowen & Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowen & Co. v. Anderson, 155 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered March 28, 1989, in this CPLR article 75 proceeding, denying a stay of arbitration, is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The parties, the respondent customer demanding arbitration and the petitioners’ stock broker and representative, agreed to arbitration "in accordance with the rules [of] * * * the American Stock Exchange”. The rules allow a customer to select arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. This was done, and nothing in the agreement between the parties limited the arbitration to the American Stock Exchange. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowen-co-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1989.