Cowdery v. Smith

50 Vt. 235
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 Vt. 235 (Cowdery v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowdery v. Smith, 50 Vt. 235 (Vt. 1877).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunton, J.

In cases like this it has always been held that it was competent for an officer to show what instructions he received from the complaining party or his attorney, as to serving a precept placed in his hands, and what he did in obedience to such instructions. Downer v. Bowen, 12 Vt. 452; Ordway v. Bacon, 14 Vt. 378; Abbott v. Edgerton, 30 Vt. 208. We, therefore, can see no valid objection to the testimony of Weeks. Although Weeks attempted to obtain an alias execution from the justice, but failed to do it in time to be of any avail to the plaintiff through negligence, yet as this was no part of his duty as deputy sheriff, and whatever obligation he assumed by undertaking this service was personal, not official, the defendant is not liable for such negligence. Wood v. Firness, 10 Eng. Law & Eq. 541; Toby v. Leonard, 15 Mass. 200.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Forrest
2004 VT 37 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2004)
Hunt v. Hill
143 A. 807 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Vt. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowdery-v-smith-vt-1877.