Cowden v. Stevenson

1 Wright 116, 1 Ohio Ch. 116
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The 108th section of the practice act of 29 O. JO. 18, gives the appeal, in civil cases, from any judgment or decree of the Court of Common Pleas, in any case in which that Court has original jurisdiction. The practice under this law is only to allow appeals from final judgments, or those judgments which dispose of the subject matter before the court. This seems to-us a case of that description. But that can make little difference to the plaintiff; for if the appeal be sustained, the Avrit must fee quashed. The writ of scire facias can only be issued in the court where the record is; but the legislature has made no provision for directing a Avrit in a case situated as this is, to another county for service; nor is it absolutely necessary they should, for, in all cases of scire facias, two nihils, in practice, are held equal to service, and to authorize the court to proceed to judgment, unless there is special provision made for other service.

The appeal is sustained, but the writ is quashed at the plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowden v. Stevenson, 1 Wright 116, 1 Ohio Ch. 116 (Ohio 1832).

1 Wright 116 (Cowden v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thornton v. St. Louis Refrigerator & Wooden Gutter Co.
65 S.W. 113 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1901)
McArthur v. Kitchen
77 Pa. 62 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1875)
Broad Top Coal & Iron Co. v. Riddlesburg Coal & Iron Co.
65 Pa. 435 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Rifener v. Bowman
53 Pa. 313 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Brewer v. Fleming
51 Pa. 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)