Cowden v. Cohen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cowden v. Cohen

231 S.W.3d 841, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2007 WL 2416777

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2007·No. No. ED 88698·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Janet L. Cowden appeals from the judgment in favor of Alan S. Cohen entered by the trial court upon the granting of Cohen’s motion for summary judgment in this legal malpractice lawsuit.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Janet L. Cowden appeals from the judgment in favor of Alan S. Cohen entered by the trial court upon the granting of Cohen’s motion for summary judgment in this legal malpractice lawsuit.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cowden v. Cohen, 231 S.W.3d 841, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2007 WL 2416777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

231 S.W.3d 841 (Cowden v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.