Cowart v. Dixie Lime & Stone Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cowart v. Dixie Lime & Stone Co.

719 So. 2d 1009, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13819, 1998 WL 754568

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 1998

DocketNo. 98-705

StatusPublished

This text of 719 So. 2d 1009 (Cowart v. Dixie Lime & Stone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowart v. Dixie Lime & Stone Co., 719 So. 2d 1009, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13819, 1998 WL 754568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from two orders of default entered against appellant for failure to answer timely the complaints filed against them by appellees. Because the record demonstrates the clerk’s defaults were nullities and the answers were filed before the court’s defaults were rendered, the answers were filed timely.

ORDERS QUASHED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from two orders of default entered against appellant for failure to answer timely the complaints filed against them by appellees. Because the record demonstrates the clerk’s defaults were nullities and the answers were filed before the court’s defaults were rendered, the answers were filed timely.

ORDERS QUASHED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 So. 2d 1009, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13819, 1998 WL 754568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowart-v-dixie-lime-stone-co-fladistctapp-1998.