Cowart v. Cowart

390 So. 2d 193, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18109
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1980·No. No. UU-86·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s judgment on the first issue presented by this appeal, i. e., whether the court erred in awarding the husband a special equity in the wife’s interest in certain notes and mortgages and a contract for deed, is AFFIRMED. We do not pass on the merits of the parties’ other contentions because the trial court has had no opportunity to consider the merits in the light of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In order that the trial court may [194] have that opportunity, we REVERSE the judgment of January 20, 1980 insofar as it deals with money and property issues other than the issue on which we have approved the trial court’s judgment, and we REMAND the case for further consideration by the trial court.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

McCORD, ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowart v. Cowart, 390 So. 2d 193, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

390 So. 2d 193 (Cowart v. Cowart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conner v. Conner
411 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)