Coward v. State
547 So. 2d 990, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4447, 1989 WL 87550
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1989·No. No. 88-3189·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to a misdemeanor violation of § 893.147(2), Fla.Stat. (1987) reserving her right to appeal certain issues. Section 893.-147(2) specifies that any violation thereof constitutes a third degree felony. Appellant has therefore entered a plea to an offense which does not exist. In light of this mutual mistake on the part of all parties below, we vacate the order of probation and remand with directions that appellant’s plea be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coward v. State, 547 So. 2d 990, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4447, 1989 WL 87550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
547 So. 2d 990 (Coward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Handley v. State
890 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Fulcher v. State
875 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Taylor v. State
710 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)