Coward v. State

547 So. 2d 990, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4447, 1989 WL 87550
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 1989
DocketNo. 88-3189
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 547 So. 2d 990 (Coward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coward v. State, 547 So. 2d 990, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4447, 1989 WL 87550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to a misdemeanor violation of § 893.147(2), Fla.Stat. (1987) reserving her right to appeal certain issues. Section 893.-147(2) specifies that any violation thereof constitutes a third degree felony. Appellant has therefore entered a plea to an offense which does not exist. In light of this mutual mistake on the part of all parties below, we vacate the order of probation and remand with directions that appellant’s plea be set aside.

THOMPSON, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Handley v. State
890 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Fulcher v. State
875 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Taylor v. State
710 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 So. 2d 990, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1848, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4447, 1989 WL 87550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coward-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.