Coward v. State

465 So. 2d 641, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 768, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13049
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1985·No. No. 84-1722·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SCHEB, Judge.

Defendant pled nolo contendere to a charge of robbery with a firearm. The trial judge adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment with a three year mandatory sentence. Defendant was sentenced under the sentencing guidelines. The trial court retained jurisdiction over one-third of the defendant’s term under section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983).

A trial court cannot retain jurisdiction over a defendant in cases in which the sentencing guidelines apply since parole is not available in such cases. Carter v. State, 464 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence but remand to the trial court to strike the retention of jurisdiction provision.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coward v. State, 465 So. 2d 641, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 768, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13049 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

465 So. 2d 641 (Coward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
485 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Ragan v. State
468 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)