Coward Shoe, Inc. v. Julius Grossman, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coward Shoe, Inc. v. Julius Grossman, Inc.

230 A.D. 751

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 751 (Coward Shoe, Inc. v. Julius Grossman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coward Shoe, Inc. v. Julius Grossman, Inc., 230 A.D. 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Matter should remain so far as possible in statu quo ante until appeal, which must be ready not later than October twenty-fourth. Stay granted to the extent of permitting defendants to state what employees now with them were “ formerly with ” Coward, with leave to plaintiff to vacate stay if acts of defendants warrant pending appeal. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter should remain so far as possible in statu quo ante until appeal, which must be ready not later than October twenty-fourth. Stay granted to the extent of permitting defendants to state what employees now with them were “ formerly with ” Coward, with leave to plaintiff to vacate stay if acts of defendants warrant pending appeal. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coward-shoe-inc-v-julius-grossman-inc-nyappdiv-1930.