Cowans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cowans v. State

564 S.W.3d 399

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2018

DocketWD 81277

StatusPublished

This text of 564 S.W.3d 399 (Cowans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowans v. State, 564 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jessuan Cowans appeals the denial after evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced when his trial attorney misinformed him that he would have to serve every day of any sentence imposed for attempted victim tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jessuan Cowans appeals the denial after evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced when his trial attorney misinformed him that he would have to serve every day of any sentence imposed for attempted victim tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 S.W.3d 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowans-v-state-moctapp-2018.