Cowans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cowans v. State

564 S.W.3d 399

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2018·No. WD 81277·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jessuan Cowans appeals the denial after evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced when his trial attorney misinformed him that he would have to serve every day of any sentence imposed for attempted victim tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jessuan Cowans appeals the denial after evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced when his trial attorney misinformed him that he would have to serve every day of any sentence imposed for attempted victim tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cowans v. State, 564 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

564 S.W.3d 399 (Cowans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.