Cowan v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Cowan v. State

460 So. 2d 287, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4648

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 19, 1984

Docket83-1353

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 So. 2d 287 (Cowan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowan v. State, 460 So. 2d 287, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4648 (Ala. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

SHORES, Justice.

We should not be understood as agreeing with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ restrictive interpretation of the dialogue between the trial court and Mr. Brown and that court’s conclusion that defendant’s trial counsel did not make a proper request to have the motion argued outside the hearing of the jury. 460 So.2d 284. However, the Court of Criminal Appeals’ interpretation of that dialogue in no way affects the decision reached in the case. Therefore, the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHORES, Justice.

We should not be understood as agreeing with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ restrictive interpretation of the dialogue between the trial court and Mr. Brown and that court’s conclusion that defendant’s trial counsel did not make a proper request to have the motion argued outside the hearing of the jury. 460 So.2d 284. However, the Court of Criminal Appeals’ interpretation of that dialogue in no way affects the decision reached in the case. Therefore, the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

460 So. 2d 287, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-state-ala-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack