Cowan v. Shields

1 Tenn. 64
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedSeptember 6, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 64 (Cowan v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowan v. Shields, 1 Tenn. 64 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1804).

Opinion

[S. C., infra, 314.]
A judgment which appears of record satisfied cannot be the ground of a sci. fa. The defendant's motion is proper.

Where execution has issued within a year and a day, another may issue afterwards without a sci. fa., and the continuances may be entered at any time, not being essential.1 Let the writ be quashed.

Note — In Simmonds v. Wood. 6 Y. 518, it was held that an execution issued more than a year and a day after judgment was not void, but only voidable, at the instance of the defendant Afterwards, by 1849, 37, brought into the Code, § 2987, scirefacias to revise is dispensed with in such cases, and execution issues after the year and day as if issued within that time. And see Gregory v. Chadwell, 3 Cold. 391. —ED.

1 See 2 Wil. 82; Comb. 346; 7 Mod. 50; 2 Ld. Ray. 800; Hardin, 521; 6 Johns. 105.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Executors of Dubois v. Van Orden
6 Johns. 105 (New York Supreme Court, 1810)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-shields-tennsuperct-1804.