Cowan v. Shields and Lackey
This text of 1 Tenn. 314 (Cowan v. Shields and Lackey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Equity. The bill charged that a bond was given by Shields to Lackey for property. Lackey assigned the bond to the plaintiff, who received a horse in part. Suit was commenced in the name of Lackey against Shields, but for the benefit of the plaintiff, and judgment recovered. After which Lackey gave Shields a receipt in full against the judgment. The bill charges, that the receipt was given by Lackey with notice on the part of Shields, that the interest of the bond resided in the plaintiff, by assignment.
Demurrer, and the following authorities cited 1 Hay. 452. 1. Eq. Cas. Ab. 121. pl. 12 ib. 44.
Demurrer overruled, and the defendants ordered to answer ; but saving the matter of the demurrer till final hearing, upon application made by the defendants counsel. See 1 John 411. 3 John 425. 1. Mass. 117. 4. Hen and Mun. 259.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Tenn. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-shields-and-lackey-tennsuperct-1808.