Cowan v. Ross

Texas Supreme Court

Cowan v. Ross

28 Tex. 227

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 28 Tex. 227 (Cowan v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowan v. Ross, 28 Tex. 227 (Tex. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Donley, J.

—It was competent for the court, on motion and notice to the plaintiff in error, to amend the entry of a previous term of the court, so that the action of the court shall truly appear by the record. This is believed to have been settled in the case of Burnett v. The State, 14 Tex., 456.. It is there said: “ A record so amended 'stands as if it had never been defective, or as if the entries had been made at the proper term.”

No error is perceived in the record as it now appears in this court, and the judgment is

Aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donley, J.

—It was competent for the court, on motion and notice to the plaintiff in error, to amend the entry of a previous term of the court, so that the action of the court shall truly appear by the record. This is believed to have been settled in the case of Burnett v. The State, 14 Tex., 456.. It is there said: “ A record so amended 'stands as if it had never been defective, or as if the entries had been made at the proper term.”

No error is perceived in the record as it now appears in this court, and the judgment is

Aeeirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Tex. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-ross-tex-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack