Cowan v. Harrod

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Cowan v. Harrod

16 Ky. 4

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ky. 4 (Cowan v. Harrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cowan v. Harrod, 16 Ky. 4 (Ky. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The following opinion of the court of appeals was delivered by

Chief Justice Muter.

The court is of opinion that the county court of Mercer did, with propriety, refuse to admit the parol testimony, as stated in the bill of exceptions, and to permit the appellant to make a survey which would not have been conformable to his title papers, or some of them, or which would intrude upon the possessions of any other person.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following opinion of the court of appeals was delivered by

Chief Justice Muter.

The court is of opinion that the county court of Mercer did, with propriety, refuse to admit the parol testimony, as stated in the bill of exceptions, and to permit the appellant to make a survey which would not have been conformable to his title papers, or some of them, or which would intrude upon the possessions of any other person.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ky. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-harrod-kyctapp-1799.