Cowan v. . Cowan

102 S.E. 613, 179 N.C. 695, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 327
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 31, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 613 (Cowan v. . Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowan v. . Cowan, 102 S.E. 613, 179 N.C. 695, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 327 (N.C. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record, and find no error.

The evidence as to the conduct of Mathis which was objected to upon the ground that the complaint alleged that the defendant, and not Mathis, had committed the fraud, was competent, as Mathis was acting for the defendant, and that the defendant was not taken by surprise is shown by the fact that he was introduced as a witness for the defendant.

There was ample evidence to support the allegations of the complaint, and the motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callahan v. Wolfe
400 P.2d 938 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1965)
Hunter v. Hyder
114 S.E.2d 493 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 613, 179 N.C. 695, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowan-v-cowan-nc-1920.