Covington v. State
This text of 169 So. 3d 276 (Covington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Kenyon Covington’s convictions and sentences for fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer and resisting an officer without violence. Despite the court granting Covington’s motion to correct a scrivener’s error, Covington’s amended written judgment erroneously reflects that he was convicted of aggravated fleeing or eluding. Accordingly, we remand for entry of a corrected written judgment. See Moore v. State, 100 So.3d 81, 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Covington need not be present when the correction is made.
Convictions and sentences affirmed; remanded for correction of the written judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 So. 3d 276, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10482, 2015 WL 4156780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covington-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.