Covington v. Johnson

667 S.E.2d 618, 284 Ga. 426, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 828
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 2008
DocketS08A1573
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 667 S.E.2d 618 (Covington v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covington v. Johnson, 667 S.E.2d 618, 284 Ga. 426, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 828 (Ga. 2008).

Opinion

Thompson, Justice.

Margaret Johnson brought an action against Cash Covington and others to quiet title to a strip of property adjacent to her home in Floyd County. After a hearing, a special master found that Johnson acquired title to the tract by adverse possession. The trial court adopted the report and findings of the special master, and entered judgment that fee simple absolute title vested solely in Johnson. Covington appeals pro se, asserting his lawyer failed to (1) disclose that he and Johnson’s lawyer were members of the same firm 1 and (2) provide effective assistance of counsel. Because these assertions were neither raised nor ruled on in the court below, they present nothing for review. See City of Gainesville v. Dodd, 275 Ga. 834, 838 (573 SE2d 369) (2002) (“The tenet that the appellate courts do not rule on issues not ruled on by the trial courts preserves the appellate courts’ jurisdiction and delineates the proper roles of the courts at the trial and appellate levels. The primary role of the appellate courts, and, in general, their jurisdiction, is properly preserved only when there is a ruling below.”).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. *427 Cash Covington, pro se. Wally Covington, pro se. Sara L. Covington, pro se. Jim M. Foss, for appellee.
1

In appellee’s brief, Johnson’s lawyer responds to this assertion by stating that he and Covington’s former lawyer are sole practitioners with law offices at different locations. He adds that they have had no association or relationship whatsoever.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Houston v. Rebecka S. Flory
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Houston v. Flory
766 S.E.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Jonathan Smith v. Fairley Cisco
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Smith v. Cisco
730 S.E.2d 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Metro Brokers, Inc. v. Sam & Cole, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Metro Brokers, Inc. v. Sams & Cole, LLC
729 S.E.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 S.E.2d 618, 284 Ga. 426, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covington-v-johnson-ga-2008.