Covington v. Herbal

Fourth Circuit

Covington v. Herbal

472 F. App'x 167

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 1, 2012·No. No. 12-6264·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jacob Tremain Covington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Covington v. Herbel, No. 5:09-ct-03176-D, 2012 WL 293249 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jacob Tremain Covington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Covington v. Herbel, No. 5:09-ct-03176-D, 2012 WL 293249 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Covington v. Herbal, 472 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

472 F. App'x 167 (Covington v. Herbal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related