Covington v. Herbal

472 F. App'x 167
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6264
StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 167 (Covington v. Herbal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Covington v. Herbal, 472 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jacob Tremain Covington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Covington v. Herbel, No. 5:09-ct-03176-D, 2012 WL 293249 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covington-v-herbal-ca4-2012.