Covill v. Phy
24 Ill. 37
This text of 24 Ill. 37 (Covill v. Phy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Covill v. Phy, 24 Ill. 37 (Ill. 1860).
Opinion
The continuance will be allowed. We do not understand that the attorneys who tried the cause below, are authorized to appear in this court, without a new retainer for that purpose.’ As the defendant does not ask to have the joinder in error stricken from the record, the joinder will stand as an appearance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brinton v. Lafond
80 Ill. App. 227 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Hooker v. Village of Brandon
43 N.W. 741 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Bassett v. Noble
15 Ill. App. 360 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 Ill. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covill-v-phy-ill-1860.