Covill v. Phy

24 Ill. 37
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The continuance will be allowed. We do not understand that the attorneys who tried the cause below, are authorized to appear in this court, without a new retainer for that purpose.’ As the defendant does not ask to have the joinder in error stricken from the record, the joinder will stand as an appearance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Covill v. Phy, 24 Ill. 37 (Ill. 1860).

24 Ill. 37 (Covill v. Phy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brinton v. Lafond
80 Ill. App. 227 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Hooker v. Village of Brandon
43 N.W. 741 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Bassett v. Noble
15 Ill. App. 360 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)