Coviello v. New York Central Railroad

23 A.2d 385, 127 N.J.L. 596, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 215
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 9, 1942·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N. J. L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly.

For affirmance — Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heher, Colie, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coviello v. New York Central Railroad, 23 A.2d 385, 127 N.J.L. 596, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1942).

23 A.2d 385 (Coviello v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coviello v. New York Central Railroad
19 A.2d 669 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)