Coviello v. New York Central Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Coviello v. New York Central Railroad

23 A.2d 385, 127 N.J.L. 596, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 215

DecidedJanuary 9, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.2d 385 (Coviello v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coviello v. New York Central Railroad, 23 A.2d 385, 127 N.J.L. 596, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N. J. L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly.

For affirmance — Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heher, Colie, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N. J. L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly.

For affirmance — Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heher, Colie, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.2d 385, 127 N.J.L. 596, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coviello-v-new-york-central-railroad-nj-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack