Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a customer in defendant Grand Union’s store, was injured as a result of the bursting of a bottle of ginger ale which she had taken from a shelf and was carrying around the store in a cart with other articles. The Trial Justice erroneously charged that, despite custody and control in plaintiff, res ipsa loquitur applied. In addition, the jury was not given a clear definition of the proof required to hold defendant as a vendor of articles liable for negligence. A new trial, wherein plaintiff will be required to go forward with evidence of some negligent act or omission on defendant’s part, should be had.
[820] The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hoestadter, Eder and Brady, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
207 Misc. 819 (Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.