Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.

207 Misc. 819, 140 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3148
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 17, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, a customer in defendant Grand Union’s store, was injured as a result of the bursting of a bottle of ginger ale which she had taken from a shelf and was carrying around the store in a cart with other articles. The Trial Justice erroneously charged that, despite custody and control in plaintiff, res ipsa loquitur applied. In addition, the jury was not given a clear definition of the proof required to hold defendant as a vendor of articles liable for negligence. A new trial, wherein plaintiff will be required to go forward with evidence of some negligent act or omission on defendant’s part, should be had.

[820] The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hoestadter, Eder and Brady, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co., 207 Misc. 819, 140 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

207 Misc. 819 (Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co.
32 Misc. 2d 920 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1961)