Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.
This text of 207 Misc. 819 (Coviello v. Hoffman Beverage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a customer in defendant Grand Union’s store, was injured as a result of the bursting of a bottle of ginger ale which she had taken from a shelf and was carrying around the store in a cart with other articles. The Trial Justice erroneously charged that, despite custody and control in plaintiff, res ipsa loquitur applied. In addition, the jury was not given a clear definition of the proof required to hold defendant as a vendor of articles liable for negligence. A new trial, wherein plaintiff will be required to go forward with evidence of some negligent act or omission on defendant’s part, should be had.
[820]*820The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hoestadter, Eder and Brady, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 Misc. 819, 140 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coviello-v-hoffman-beverage-co-nyappterm-1955.